The Well-Architected Framework is Microsoft's definition of what good looks like on Azure, organised into five pillars: reliability, security, cost optimisation, operational excellence and performance efficiency. A review scores a real workload against all five, which matters because estates are usually strong on the pillar their team cares about and quietly weak on the other four.
Ours is deliberately practical. Read-only analysis of your Azure estate, a handful of workshops with the people who own the workloads, and two to three weeks end to end. The output is a scored assessment and a remediation backlog ranked by impact and effort, so the first sprint of fixes chooses itself.
The findings follow a pattern we see everywhere: compute provisioned for a peak that never comes, single points of failure that have never been tested, alerting that pages nobody, and quick security wins hiding in plain sight. None of it is embarrassing; all of it is fixable, and most of the cost findings fund the rest of the work.
Reviews also make excellent starting points. They qualify for Microsoft funding in many cases, they give a new partner relationship a low-risk first engagement, and they hand your leadership an independent, evidence-based view of the estate before bigger decisions get made.