Skip to main content

Identify Hidden Inefficiencies

Well-Architected Reviews

The Azure bill keeps climbing, nobody has tested failover since it was built, and every architecture question gets answered from memory. A Well-Architected Review replaces hunches with evidence: real workloads scored against Microsoft's five pillars, with a remediation backlog you can start next sprint.

Five Pillars · Two Weeks · One Plan

What is an Azure Well-Architected Review?

The Well-Architected Framework is Microsoft's definition of what good looks like on Azure, organised into five pillars: reliability, security, cost optimisation, operational excellence and performance efficiency. A review scores a real workload against all five, which matters because estates are usually strong on the pillar their team cares about and quietly weak on the other four.

Ours is deliberately practical. Read-only analysis of your Azure estate, a handful of workshops with the people who own the workloads, and two to three weeks end to end. The output is a scored assessment and a remediation backlog ranked by impact and effort, so the first sprint of fixes chooses itself.

The findings follow a pattern we see everywhere: compute provisioned for a peak that never comes, single points of failure that have never been tested, alerting that pages nobody, and quick security wins hiding in plain sight. None of it is embarrassing; all of it is fixable, and most of the cost findings fund the rest of the work.

Reviews also make excellent starting points. They qualify for Microsoft funding in many cases, they give a new partner relationship a low-risk first engagement, and they hand your leadership an independent, evidence-based view of the estate before bigger decisions get made.

Reviews grounded in the Microsoft Well-Architected Framework

Infrastructure (Azure)
Infrastructure (Azure)
Digital App Innovation (Azure)
Digital App Innovation (Azure)
Data & AI on Azure
Data & AI on Azure
Security
Security
What We Deliver

Key capabilities

Azure Advisor & Architecture Centre Insights

Azure Advisor and Architecture Centre insights combined with hands-on architectural review, surfacing recommendations across reliability, security, performance and cost.

  • Scored against all five Well-Architected pillars
  • Read-only analysis: your engineers keep shipping throughout
  • Findings ranked by impact and effort, not alphabetically
  • Microsoft funding eligibility checked as standard

Application Recovery at Scale

Resilience planning, failover strategy and disaster recovery assessment that test whether your recovery objectives would survive contact with a real outage.

Cost Optimisation & Performance Tuning

Savings quantified in pounds rather than percentages, across reservations, right-sizing and idle resources, paired with tuning fixes that improve response times as spend comes down.

Proactive Security Evaluation

Workloads benchmarked against Zero Trust and your compliance requirements, with vulnerabilities ranked by how likely they are to be exploited, not how easy they are to list.

Storage & Performance Bottleneck Analysis

The bottlenecks that make applications feel slow or expensive, traced to their cause, with remediation steps ordered so the first fixes deliver the most relief.

2 wks

From kick-off to a detailed remediation plan

5

Well-Architected pillars scored and benchmarked

100%

Findings prioritised by business impact

0

Disruption to delivery: the review is read-only

Common Use Cases

Where Well-Architected Reviews earns its keep

Cost optimisation review

Identify concrete savings across reservations, right-sizing, storage tiers, idle resources and licensing with quantified impact.

Reliability and resilience audit

Stress-test your architecture against failure modes, SLAs and recovery objectives, and prioritise resilience gaps before they bite.

Security posture assessment

Benchmark workloads against Microsoft Zero Trust, Defender recommendations and industry frameworks, with a pragmatic fix list.

Performance and scalability review

Diagnose throughput, latency and scaling issues across compute, storage and data services, with tuning recommendations that pay back quickly.

Operational excellence readiness

Review observability, release practices, on-call and runbooks so day-2 operations do not undermine the platform you have built.

Pre-go-live assurance

Independent review of a new Azure workload before it hits production, so issues are found in dev rather than at 3am on launch day.

How We Work

A proven delivery approach

  1. 01 Step

    Scope

    Agree workloads, pillars in scope, stakeholders and the questions the review needs to answer.

  2. 02 Step

    Analyse

    Combine Azure Advisor, Defender, Cost Management and hands-on architecture review against the five WAF pillars.

  3. 03 Step

    Recommend

    Produce a prioritised, quantified list of findings and a pragmatic remediation plan with owners and effort estimates.

  4. 04 Step

    Support

    Optionally deliver or co-deliver the remediation work and re-run the review to measure improvement.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What does a Well-Architected Review cover?

The five WAF pillars: reliability, security, cost optimisation, operational excellence and performance efficiency. We apply them to a specific workload or a broader Azure estate, combining Microsoft tooling with hands-on architectural review.

How long does a review take?

A single-workload review typically runs 2–4 weeks. A broader estate-wide review across dozens of workloads usually takes 4–8 weeks. You get a prioritised remediation plan at the end in either case.

Can reviews qualify for Microsoft funding?

Often, yes. Microsoft offers Azure migration and innovation funds that can partly offset WAR engagements, especially when coupled with a modernisation or migration plan. We help clients apply for and use these where applicable.

What kind of savings are realistic?

Most reviews surface 20–40% cost-reduction opportunities across reservations, right-sizing, storage tiering and idle resources, along with meaningful reliability and security improvements that are harder to quantify but often more valuable.

Do you only review Azure workloads you built?

No. We regularly review estates built by other partners or internal teams. An independent Well-Architected perspective is often the most credible way to understand the real state of a complex Azure footprint.

Can you fix the findings too?

Yes. We can deliver or co-deliver the remediation with your team, and measure the improvement with a follow-up review – so the recommendations translate into real business outcomes, not shelved slides.

Our Clients

Trusted by

Glassmoon
Lanware
Micheldever Tyre Services
Midwich
Mount Anvil
Nuevo Partners
Pro Global
Seras Energy
Skanska
Ocean Conservation Trust
WA Comms
Glassmoon
Lanware
Micheldever Tyre Services
Midwich
Mount Anvil
Nuevo Partners
Pro Global
Seras Energy
Skanska
Ocean Conservation Trust
WA Comms
Client Voices

Hear from our clients

Video Stories

Skanska testimonial video
Skanska

David, Skanska

Project/Programme Manager

Mount Anvil testimonial video
Mount Anvil

Mike, Mount Anvil

Head of Technology Applications

Testimonials

Book a Well-Architected Review

Read-only access, a handful of workshops and two to three weeks end to end: you get a scored assessment and a remediation backlog ranked by impact and effort. We check Microsoft funding eligibility as standard.

Book your review